leadership at sydney atheists

November 25, 2009 at 7:30 pm (atheism, essays)

i can’t believe it. semester is over, i’ve submitted my second assignment. it was due yesterday and i got it in at 12.45 this morning. less than an hour late, that’s pretty incredible for me. i was given less than two weeks for it, right after putting in another one in exactly two weeks. did he think the problem had disappeared because i came through once? well i guess this makes it nearly-twice, though it’s pretty substandard for an essay. i’m hoping he accepts it as an experiment, project or case study, especially since i’ve included my draft objects and rules as… what, supporting evidence? writing that was the reason i couldn’t spend time on this, oh, apart from formwork being laid for a concrete path outside my window on my last day to work on it, with no warning… so i hope he appreciates it even though i’ve given him a big rant with not nearly the referencing i expect of myself. or the coherence, and i know i’ve often put in work that just didn’t have time to be put together. oh, and it’s totally unedited. i think a majority of the text was actually written between about 10pm and 12.45am, and i’m not one of those people who can rely on that kind of thing. and i had an 8am meeting in the city this morning. so i’m very glad i’m generally pretty literate. it shouldn’t be massacred too much as i did employ my usual colour coding system to mark paragraphs which have some kind of start, finish and idea. by the time i clicked send, all i had was blue text so i’m hoping my running categorisation was at least slightly accurate. i doubt i’ll be able to read it again to find out, but it’s here just in case. as for the actual content… it’s been a very interesting exercise, but i’m not actually going to stand by what i’ve said too heavily. at least not unless i’m forced to actually read the thing and find out what i’ve said! i’m doing that nice turn where one writes in a blog things that should probably remain private – there are two people mentioned specifically and i’ve edited out the name of the one who isn’t me, but it’s not hard to tell who i’m talking about if you know the organisation. in painting the situation with a broad brush i suspect i’ve been overly harsh or at least rude to him, and in examining the situation from the perspective of what i personally can contribute i suspect i’ve exagerated my own competence. whatever my misgivings, this is my archive of essays so i’m posting it, in the assumption that nothing bad will come of it, as why would anyone want to read it if i can’t even manage to? but hah! turns out it’s within 10% of word count and i didn’t even check. had to do something right, somewhere…

Leadership in Sydney Atheists Incorporated

Sydney Atheist Action Group was formed a year and a half ago in April 2008, by members of a non-political discussion group, the Atheist Meetup, who wanted to do something beyond the scope of that group. Initially the Action Group consisted of a collective structure along with eight collective working groups which dealt with various projects and functions identified by the members in the first meeting.

Soon one member, A., was proposing structures, setting agendas, chairing collective meetings and doing a large proportion of the talking, while putting a particular viewpoint, “Positive Atheism”; encouraging working groups to set targets and report to the main collective.

In July 2008 came the group’s first big challenge and chance for exposure, responding to a papal visit and the NSW government’s corresponding financial and planning indiscretions. Priority was focused heavily on the world youth day and tshirts working groups, to the exclusion of most others. The plan was ambitious for a fledgling group, now rebranded as Sydney Atheists, including poll posters, a picnic, a small ‘greeting’ protest, and involvement in the large No To Pope protest, with a big banner and several people wearing Sydney Atheists tshirts. Overall people were very pleased with the events and the response, which supported a much grander view of the small organisation, in line with the new name and A.’s vision. A. was solidified as a leader due to guiding the planning process, much work, and being listed as the contact person and therefore being interviewed several times.

In September 2008, in line with this vision, Sydney Atheists incorporated. The organisation gained a committee structure, a legal status, a post box, restructured subcommittees run by officebearers, A. as president, and tensions over transparency, control and purpose. A. and a few others took care of the paperwork and legal aspects, a few points were hashed out in big acrimonious meetings and others were glossed over in order to meet deadlines. An executive was formed, with many office bearer positions tailored to specific candidates. Elections therefore went smoothly despite opposition to the previous process.

In the next year there were many achievements, from a stall at the Newtown Festival, a Mardi Gras float and progress on getting philosophy classes into NSW schools, to regular social events and podcasts and maintaining a functional website. Yet division was solidifying within the committee, as it began to appear that four people were running the organisation without the support of the rest of the active membership. Several members were concerned about accessibility and transparency issues, ranging from loss of membership forms and lack of minutes to closed meetings, and an assortment of questions regarding purpose and direction. A member was castigated for being aggressive while wearing a Sydney Atheists tshirt, and the president tried to install a manifesto which not only took an unpopular position, but was seen by many as inappropriate for an atheist organisation, regardless of popularity. Suspicion grew and people were attacked on all sides; in part, A.’s style was simply incompatible with the activists. His initiating of structure was seen as far too directive for a voluntary organisation full of people who wish to lead change themselves and not just follow. There were many attempts to resolve misunderstandings and come to compromises, but suspicion only increased and aggression became more vocal online, while both committee and subcommittee attendance decreased.

Currently, Sydney Atheists runs mainly through an email list, a website, monthly meetings and irregular subcommittee meetings, and unofficially through Meetup events. Most productive work is at a halt, with the latest people doing work on the education subcommittee dropping out without handovers, and the IT subcommittee overloaded and underattended. Most members of the structured committee have resigned or dropped out of communication, and while people are still confused about that structure, monthly committee meetings, scheduled two hours prior to Meetup events, are now running with acceptable attendance under the assumption that any interested person is equally entitled to attend, participate and vote. The current participants are heavily drawn from those who were involved in subgroup work and the discussions dissenting to the structure. Meetings and email discussion are now both largely calm and productive, though not all tasks required are committed to, or enforced.

The organisation seems to be cohering due to a more ideologically homogenous group remaining motivated to be active at the present time, in the wake of several resignations. In September 2009 A. announced his intention to resign as president, followed rapidly by the other office bearers. Online argument died down and meetings began to be held and attended. The first AGM was set for November, and productive discussion began on how to change the structure beforehand, to make the organisation more workable. The period between the resignations and the annual general meeting was acknowledged as important for the next stage of the organisation. After two well-attended, calm and productive committee meetings in September and October, there seemed to be a sense among attendees that there was a chance to make changes which could be ratified properly at the AGM, leading into a stable new year. People volunteered to make changes to the Objects and Rules of the organisation, and to give notice of the AGM. However lapses still existed in allocating and monitoring tasks, and after a while all discussion stopped. The pre-AGM meetings were not organised and a draft revised Objects and Rules was not written by the deadline for posting notice of AGM business.

In November 2009, the AGM was rescheduled for December and the conditions were finally met correctly, including a final draft revision being submitted for ratification. Several trenchant problems appear to have been resolved since one group ceded control to the other, though the effects of the latter’s leadership have not yet been well tested. Considering what can be anticipated from the organisation’s entire history, however, there is still much to do. If they are accepted, the revised Objects and Rules should take significant steps to providing an acceptable sense of purpose that is concrete enough for everyone to grasp, and address all identified transparency and accessibility issues.

Beyond that, the group needs to articulate whether it leans towards educating non-atheists or creating atheist community internally; in a group so similar to a social movement, these distinctions are not obvious (West 2008). It will need to examine motivations for involvement and ensure enough people see benefits which are high enough to cancel out their costs of involvement, despite having just abolished yet another personal benefit – the power and status of gaining an office bearer position. As we cut the position of President, the lack of an hierarchical leader becomes even clearer. The group must become open to emergent leadership and shared leadership (Carte, Chidambaram & Becker 2006), and it has some access to common forms of leadership substitutes; subcommittees can work like teams in some respects, members are commonly highly educated and interested in self education, and a strong use of technology allows information to be shared and decisions made over a broader base (Howell et al. 1990).

My involvement in Sydney Atheists has been varied. I started the Action Group by cultivating members and setting up email groups, putting opinions and sharing visions, calling meetings, chairing them and setting their agendas. I stepped away when A. took over, I had no expertise in the style of organisation he was establishing and, as Oliver (Oliver 1984) would suggest, the benefits no longer balanced out the costs since my work was no longer essential. I stopped attending committee meetings in pubs unless I had been specifically requested to, and concentrated instead on the working groups in which I had a particular interest; the survey group was working on a project I’ve had in mind for many years and the education group concerns issues I work with and study. I also initiated the 2009 Sydney Atheists Mardi Gras Bus Campaign float, and found a partner to help me run it. Throughout, I kept in touch with other members who shared my views, waiting for an opportunity to make changes without tearing down any good things that the current leaders were doing.

I was overseas when internal conflict started getting severe, but I was in contact with several people about the situation and when I returned I resumed active involvement. I participated in email discussions, between attempting to mediate the conflict a little and more encouraging the dissenters to align and take action. I attended all committee meetings, the first of which dealt with the resignations. I had plenty to say and supported others but didn’t take on any specific tasks. A week before the AGM was set, I realised that the legal notice had not gone out and it was too late to call the meeting for the date we had agreed on, much less nominate for positions or give notice for an agenda item. There had been no word from the people who took responsibility for policy or notices, so I alerted the email list with all the details I could find, and sat down with the Objects and Rules to make my own draft revision, which I made available as soon as possible. While absolutely no discussion of the document appeared online, I kept prompting the correspondence until the timeslot that we planned to have the AGM became a committee meeting primarily for review of the document, and the AGM was bumped back to the first date that I understood would be legal if the notice went out on the day we met.

I consider revising the Objects and Rules to be an important instance of leadership as people have been trying hard to follow them, but their density was a barrier (Oliver 1984) to involvement for many people unfamiliar with legal documents. Doing the actual work of writing of the revision was also important, as it appears the job was a sticking point, preventing progress.

The new version is written in plain English in many important places, though not everywhere. I intend to adjust even more, and offer a third version if necessary, at next year’s AGM. I have changed the vision statement to something more directed to what I believe the current active members want, including references to atheism and activism, both of which were specifically omitted from the original. I have abolished all office bearer positions except for Secretary and Treasurer, leaving leadership of different projects in the hands of the relevant subcommittee. I have made it easier to join the organisation, and based committee membership on meeting attendance, like a collective. In short, I have made the organisation’s purpose more specific, and opened up the structure so people can participate more easily while discouraging those who seek to control power or gain personal prestige.

At the pre-AGM committee meeting on November 22, I chaired the meeting. Over four hours, about ten people went through the document step by step and ended up with a draft revision we were all pleased with. Thanks to wireless internet, we put also put out acceptable official notices immediately. When we were done I took the document home to check, edit, format and make non-substantive changes that no one had wanted to linger over. It is posted on the website with three weeks before the AGM for members to read it and suggest small amendments. One has already been made. Considering that ten people were happy with the revision, which is well above our quorum requirements, I expect the revision to be ratified on November 14.

Other than working with documents, I believe I can show leadership in discussing direction, cultivating ties and ensuring I am informed enough to be able to step in as needed. I expect to continue keeping in touch with active members so that I am in a position to check up on undertakings being kept; also with the people who have moved away from the organisation over its troubles, to try to encourage them back now there is more room for them, while monitoring the membership to ensure that the cohesion we have recently achieved is not actually reliant on exclusivity. I also wish to educate myself about association rules and the incorporation act so we do not need to rely on A.’s expertise as much as we did, while still taking him up on his offer to explain the formalities. I intend to encourage making ties to other communities and demographics, not just through cooperation with established groups, but starting UTS Atheists and a Queeredge movement, supporting the fledgling Australian University Atheists, establishing Sydney Queer Atheists which hasn’t done anything since Mardi Gras 2009, and restarting work on a public survey of atheist self-identification. Each project has its own timeline, but will all benefit Sydney Atheists, helping the organisation and the atheist community in general become a more diverse and political. A final issue on which I feel I will have to wait for the right opportunity to rectify, is the lack of distinction between Sydney Atheists and the Atheist Meetup in the eyes of many, members and strangers alike.

Carte, T.A., Chidambaram, L. & Becker, A. 2006, ‘Emergent leadership in self-managed virtual teams’, Group Decision and Negotiation, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 323-343.

Howell, J.P., Bowen, D.E., Dorfman, P.W., Kerr, S. & Podsakoff, P.M. 1990, ‘Substitutes for leadership: Effective alternatives to ineffective leadership’, Organizational Dynamics, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 20-39.

Oliver, P. 1984, ‘”If You Don’t Do it, Nobody Else Will”: Active and Token Contributors to Local Collective Action’, American Sociological Review, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 601 – 610.

West, D. 2008, ‘Informal public leadership: the case of social movements’, in P. Hart & J. Uhr (eds), Public Leadership: Perspectives and Practices, ANU E Press, Canberra, pp. 133 – 144.

Permalink Leave a Comment

emergent leadership

November 12, 2009 at 3:51 pm (essays)

i’ve just put this in – on time!

well, that’s after about three extensions and five topic changes… but i’m still happy.

 

Eight articles around Emergent Leadership and substitutes for leadership

Examining studies of emergent leadership and substitutes for leadership with a view to informal leadership in minority communities produces no comprehensive research fitting the situation, but plenty of interesting points and directions to pursue.

Most work on emergent leadership studies the exercising of influence within an organisation where some leadership is still provided by a positional leader. In a hierarchy, emergent and shared leadership can be of great benefit but it must be supported by several other non-traditional structures and conditions.

Teamwork, training and low structure situations allow scope for emergent leadership and, at least in voluntary situations, pessimism about the likelihood of others doing the job is one reason that people are provoked to act. Yet acceptance by followers is also important; one determinant of people likely to be favoured as emergent leaders by teams is being moderate in their tendency to take control.

Supervisory and feedback behaviour can be substituted for, yet directive leadership behaviour seems to make a difference to the performance of a team. A single point of illumination in each of so many directions, are only starting to shed light on an obscure, yet important area of research. Much more study could be done on a wide range of topics from leadership in non-hierarchical, politically engaged and emerging contexts and different power distance settings, to what former experiences influence people to lead well, or to lead at all.

Many frameworks are drawn from various facets of scholarship to sketch the territory; levels of structure, power distance, categorisations of cultures and lists of tasks and considerations, behaviours and roles involved in leadership. Still, for most practical applications, the best prescription that can be offered so far is to be aware of all the pitfalls and opportunities that can be found.

 

1. Substitutes for Hierarchy considers emergent leadership as one of several changes that can be made in a hierarchical organisation, which can allow it to flatten its structure; broadening workers’ jobs and authority while reducing the various levels of supervisors; staff doing unnecessary jobs unrelated to its core products and services.

Leadership is contextualised, not as the peak of all processes but as one of many interdependent factors, all of which are important for making an organisation run well. The major tasks of various levels of supervisors are listed as motivation, record keeping, coordinating, assigning work, making personnel decisions, providing expertise, setting goals, planning, linking communications, training/coaching, controlling and leading. However, employing separate ranks of non-production staff is not the only way to fulfil these functions.

Several factors are listed as concerned in substituting for supervisors including systems, flexibility, ownership, access to information and control over decision making in many areas: work design, information systems technology, financial data, reward system practices, supplier/customer contact, training, vision/values and emergent leadership. The article suggests that emergent leadership, as with any other single factor, cannot be introduced alone into a hierarchical organisation and expected to make changes. Unsupported it will probably even cause problems, but new and viable possibilities arise when the right conditions are created, by encouraging it in conjunction many or all of the listed factors.

The one issue about emergent leadership which is addressed directly, is of the ‘key to the emergence of the right kind of leader’. The prescription is the same as for the wider purposes: if emergent leaders are sought in the context of all these other initiatives, they are likely to fit the environment and the goals of the organisation.

Though the article focuses on change within hierarchical organisations, these considerations appear applicable beyond situations with such an initial state, showing an image of a non hierarchical organisation and suggestions of what such an entity could viably involve.

Lawler, E.E. 1988, ‘Substitutes for Hierarchy’, Organization Dynamics, vol. 17, pp. 4-15.

 

2. “If You Don’t Do It, Nobody Else Will”: Active and Token Contributors to Local Collective Action examines leadership, activism and membership in the context of neighbourhood organisations.

In a study of data collected in Detroit in 1969, some interesting conclusions were made. Perhaps most strikingly, the people who do the most work in a voluntary organisation, were found to be the ones who were most pessimistic about the possibility of their neighbours doing such work. Though this will come as little surprise to those who do work in such conditions, it marks a significant difference from the characteristics of the more structured, less voluntary organisations which are more often studied in leadership literature. Other aspects of attitude and vision are not found to have the impact they do in such situations: while interest in the collective good is a significant factor in determining who will join an organisation, it is found to have very little impact on who does the work.

To understand why people are active, the article examines the various costs and benefits of various levels of involvement. While the success of community organisations involve huge benefits for the community in general, the people who do the work reap little more benefit than anyone else, while shouldering the vast bulk of the costs in terms of time, money and stress. Also considered as costs are more absolute barriers to involvement, such as lack of education or experience, which narrow the pool of people who would even consider participating.

Another interesting finding involves the relationship between activism and ties. While having many friends in the area was an indicator of membership, activists are more likely to have few strong ties and more weak ties, or acquaintances, which may possibly suggest that, while lack of acquaintances is a barrier to involvement, one of the few individual rewards that activism can offer is social interaction for those who don’t have many strong friendships in the area.

In terms of direct investigation of leadership, the study identifies some characteristics of former leaders and otherwise considers leadership as one aspect of activism. Past leaders are found to be interested in local issues and know more people than others do, however no causal relationship is established. Leadership positions are found to be widely available yet hard to fill, in distinct contrast to employing organisations; in voluntary cooperatives being a leader is associated with as bad a ratio of costs to compensating rewards as for any activist, if not worse.

Oliver, P. 1984, ‘”If You Don’t Do it, Nobody Else Will”: Active and Token Contributors to Local Collective Action’, American Sociological Review, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 601 – 610.

 

3. Informal Public Leadership: The Case of Social Movements examines the conditions of leadership in politically engaged communities such as social movements, especially several differences between social movement leadership and other leadership literature.

Social movements tend to deal with emerging issues and identities. There tends to be, therefore, no established group of followers or employees for a leader to lead, which means a significant portion of leadership in social movements is concerned with creating and maintaining membership; persuading people to follow, and even just to identify as part of the movement.

Leadership in social movements is under-theorised, both in leadership literature which focuses on institutions and in social movements where there tends to be a suspicion of leadership along with a general opposition to hierarchy and authority.

Any leader in such a context must be informal. They can’t expect to control or predict the actions of the people, but must focus on inspiring, activating and empowering, both to those inclined to listen and those not. With no traditional authority to draw on, moral and social capital are the start of ways to exercise leadership within social movements, which themselves exercise leadership in the broader community.

West, D. 2008, ‘Informal public leadership: the case of social movements’, in P. Hart & J. Uhr (eds), Public Leadership: Perspectives and Practices, ANU E Press, Canberra, pp. 133 – 144.

 

4. Emergent Leadership in Self-Managed Virtual Teams: A Longitudinal Study of Concentrated and Shared Leadership Behaviors details a study of the messages passed between virtual teams working on a database project within an undergraduate course. Work needing to be done by a group of people in different places is becoming increasingly relevant. Dealing with actual language makes it interestingly specific, but that also means that generalising its findings to other contexts is questionable. This study claims to be unusual in that it deals with internal, emergent leadership instead of the role of an external leader. However, the context is still distinctly framed by the existence of such an external leader, a common but not universal situation for virtual groups.

Four hypotheses are proposed regarding differences in communication between high and low performing teams; that high performing teams display more leadership behaviours in general, and more each of directive, shared and concentrated leadership behaviours, and that leadership behaviours which are evident early are significant and those that develop later are not. The results supported, at least partially, each of these hypotheses.

Denison, Hooijberg and Quinn’s Leaderplex Framework is used, which lists eight leadership behaviours or roles; the innovator, broker, producer, director, coordinator, monitor, facilitator and mentor. They are divided between directive, participative and transformational leadership. Monitor and Producer behaviour, both associated with Directive leadership, were found to vary most between the high and low performance groups, suggesting that these are the areas critical to performance. However many details are not adequately explained, including how teams are designated as high or low performing.

Beyond the original research, many interesting ideas are brought up. Avolio’s E-leadership, Griffith, Sawyer and Neale’s degrees of virtualness and DeSanctis’ concerns about using student responses in studies.

Carte, T.A., Chidambaram, L. & Becker, A. 2006, ‘Emergent leadership in self-managed virtual teams’, Group Decision and Negotiation, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 323-343.

 

5. Tipping Points that Inspire Leadership: An Exploratory Study of Emergent Project Leaders considers leadership as a social construction, the development of which can be influenced in individuals at various stages of life, by significant individuals and significant experiences. The study investigates such triggers to leadership by surveying university project management students who have been already identified as having performed leadership, or having strong potential.

Teachers and family members, particularly fathers were cited as positively significant by respondents. Potential mentors and inspirations were listed far more often than potential followers.

A wide range of experiences were reported, largely from work and study. The results do not indicate what aspects of the experiences are formative of leadership potential, such as whether success, opportunity or frustration is key, however many possibilities for further research are discussed.

People and experiences having negative influence were surveyed too, but these responses may be of limited value with no control group of bad leaders or non leaders.

Toor, S. & Ofori, G. 2008, ‘Tipping points that inspire leadership: An exploratory study of emergent project leaders’, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 212-229.

 

6. Cross-Cultural Leadership Dynamics in Collectivism and High Power Distance Settings illustrates the importance of differences between expected and manifest culture. The example discussed is a North American manager trying to lead a Malaysian workforce; although the manager expects cultural differences, simplistic expectations can prove to produce even more misunderstandings by encouraging inattention to the actual, manifest culture.

Although this article discusses an individual entering the majority culture of a location, the frameworks used could illuminate other situations. Taken from Hofstede’s framework, cultures are distinguished as collectivist or individualist, accepting or not of unequal distribution of power (high or low power distance).

Collectivism is considered to usually be associated with high power distance and individualism with low power distance, but this is not universal. It would be interesting to apply these designations to a minority culture, for example a community or social movement with an (at least) expected culture of low power distance and collectivism, located within a majority culture which is declared to be individualist and low-moderate power distance, such as Australia.

In the example of Malaysia an extra complication is discussed, that of the miscommunications inherent in the clash of different varieties of English. The majority cultures of native English speaking countries tend to fall on the individualistic side of the framework, and many countries where English is a common second language are more collectivist. Considering even just the differences between the definition of collectivism between the article and its usage Australian social movements, the injunction to not ignore any of these differences is probably well applicable to the latter example as well.

Schermerhorn, J. & Bond, M. 1997, ‘Cross-cultural leadership dynamics in collectivism and high power distance settings’, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 187-193.

 

7. Substitutes for Leadership: Effective Alternatives to Ineffective Leadership explores a history of leadership literature; various theories of leadership have been popular at different times but a constant has been the premise that in any problem, better leadership is a solution. Several examples of substitutes are offered, including closely knit teams of highly trained individuals, intrinsic satisfaction, computer technology and extensive professional education. The aspects of leadership which are discussed as being substituted for mainly involve feedback and supervision.

Leadership neutralisers and enhancers are also discussed. Neutralisers such as physical distance, inappropriate reward systems and the bypassing or countermanding of the leader by a higher level, are considered to reduce the leader’s influence without filling the gap like a substitute should. Enhancers, on the other hand, augment the leader’s impact. The examples given of leadership enhancers include attributes such as cohesion and strong norms of performance or of cooperation with management .

Howell, J.P., Bowen, D.E., Dorfman, P.W., Kerr, S. & Podsakoff, P.M. 1990, ‘Substitutes for leadership: Effective alternatives to ineffective leadership’, Organizational Dynamics, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 20-39.

 

8. Emergent Leadership Processes as a Function of Task Structure and Machiavellianism considers an emergent view of leadership as a product of both personality and situation.

The study identified people as high, medium or low ‘machs’, indicating tendency to take over control in small groups, and situations as high or low structure; high structure involving the group being given explicit procedural instructions.

The hypotheses of the study were that people identified as high machs would exhibit more leadership behaviours and be recognised as leaders more in situations of low structure, and that low machs would do the same in high structure situations.

The results did not support the hypotheses at all; medium machs were markedly preferred as leaders in both situations.

Implications of structure difference included low structure having more scope for emergent leadership, but high structure leaving people more satisfied with the outcomes.

Gleason, J.M., Seaman, F.J. & Hollander, E.P. 1978, ‘Emergent leadership processes as a function of task structure and Machiavellianism’, Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 33-36.

Permalink Leave a Comment

my philosophy of education… in 2002

December 24, 2008 at 12:45 am (education, essays)

another old essay i’ve dug up. i recall this being one of the few essays i ever enjoyed, and having lots of inspiring ideas in it, but i hardly dared read it again. i had to though, as i only had a hard copy. on reading every word so that i could type it out, i found it hard to restrain myself from tweaking grammar, explaining and elaborating, smoothing over the dogmatism and idealism, and adding whole chapters on exciting thoughts i’ve discovered in the last six years. still, not bad for a 1200 word essay, and it looks like i didn’t even get an extension; how unusual! i dug it up because i’m about to start thinking about educational philosophy again in my MEd, and besides, i’ve recently agreed to put starting a school onto the agenda at Sydney Atheists. it is, after all, my biggest life goal. so here goes…

The various perspectives relating to education and which were outlined in the first four weeks of the unit provide a benchmark against which to position our views about schooling and teaching. In truth, these views are likely to be eclectic, drawing on aspects of all four perspectives. Outlining your own philosophy of education (an aspect of your identity as a teacher) indicate, through reference to the relevant and related literature, the ways in which it reflects aspects of these various perspectives.

The current system of education in Australia swings between Liberalism and Instrumentalism, neither of which recognise the needs for societal change or individual difference. This does not mean there are no other options. This proposal is heavily influenced by the Libertarian Free Schools, tempered with Critical Pedagogy. Drawn particularly from the works of Paolo Friere, Ivan Illich and A. S. Neill, it is radically different from prevailing systems. To be adopted would require changes in societal attitudes, but the ability to critique is something it attempts to foster.

The nature of our society is largely determined by three interlinking institutions, family, church and school. In Illich’s distinction between manipulative and convivial institutions, (McLaren & Leonard, 1993) all three tend to be manipulative. The influence of family and especially church are fading, but it is both possible and incredibly important to work towards a convivial system of education.

Friere’s Critical Pedagogy (Shor, 1980) draws generative themes from the students’ lives to introduce critical perspectives on power relations in their lives, and to teach literacy as a means of empowerment. It was used teaching adult literacy in South America, but such characteristics as dialogic communication, problematisation, praxis and shared choice of content can be adapted to Australian school life. It is not enough, however, to merely apply the methods of Critical Pedagogy to traditional structures and subjects.

Once the concept is accepted that schools are not, or should not be knowledge factories, there is so much that can be done. The first step is to integrate the school into the community. At present schools tend to take advantage of the community in a very limited fashion, stylised and primarily to do with work – from work experience in high school down to excursions to the local vet and police station in kindy, the way the outside world is presented to students creates and enforces the distinction between school and the child on one side, and the professional and the workplace on the other. When people leave school they carry this view with them, and many never continue with education because of it. This is all despite the very public knowledge that this does not happen, that children cannot always be protected from life and they will be pushed through to adulthood regardless of whether they can read or any other of the multitude of skills supposed to be necessary to existence.

If we are serious about freedom, we must break down some of the distinctions between the child at school and the adult world. Some Libertarians (Spring, 1975) advocate the abolition of school altogether, but it does not need to be taken that far. To make the school a community centre where anyone can study would integrate the two worlds, to their mutual advantage.

A University or Community College style arrangement would facilitate this integration. Instead of either age grading or streaming, courses would be organised by subject, with various levels being provided as required. A wide variety of courses should be offered, not restricted to those preferred by a particular perspective. Practical, Critical Instrumentalist subjects are important, but so are Liberal subjects, the stipulation being that they must also be taught critically, instead of pretending they are value-free. If accreditation is by competency on individual units and workload is negotiated with one’s counselor, then compulsory courses become unnecessary, though some courses will naturally be strongly recommended, especially at lower levels.

This arrangement surmounts the perennial problem of streaming by allowing students to make choices – having a range of valid and acceptable choices for every student. It however requires considerable support: students are being presented with possibly frightening choice and freedom, and even in Summerhill (Neill, 1926) one can never ensure every student is equipped to make the choice. Individual care is required, in the form of counsellors, charged with the ongoing care of a small number of students. This not only ensures students have somebody to make sure they are getting the most out of their school, give advice and help with a strong knowledge of both student and school, but this kind of attention to each student and their choices also works to overcome somewhat the structural disadvantages of family (Matthews, 1980).

Another Libertarian system which could benefit the proposal is the Learning Web (Illich, 1970). Illich’s model consists of a sytem of registers, where students can find four things: peers to learn with, teachers, informants or mentors to learn from, resources to learn with and professional educators to help out when required. It was designed for a similar environment to Friere’s work, but would also be valuable adapted to the situation at hand. A school is perfectly placed to keep such registers, and access to them fills out the range of subjects and learning styles that cannot be accommodated by the regular classes, ensuring that tailoring to a student’s needs is not subordinated to the bureaucracy. Running parallel to other classes, a web would be easily accommodated within the given framework. It would be maintained by the counselors, who would interview all parties, rather than review qualifications, for suitability and readiness. The regular teaching staff would superviese and run teacher training within the school. A school is also perfectly situated to both connect students of similar needs and arrange access to resources.

Naturally each and every element requires more funding, yet considering this country has one of the lowest public expenditures on education in the OECD (Martin, 2001), a significant increase in funding is actually quite a reasonable request. In fact, it is a necessary one if even the current education system is to fulfill what is expected of it for a period longer than is being considered by those in control, who are elected every three or four years.

That brings us to another aspect of Neill’s brand of libertarianism: participatory democracy (Neill, 1926). The only way this proposal can remain authentic is if it remains responsive to the actual needs and desires of those involved. Giving students and staff members equal voices and opportunities to change important aspects of the running of the school fulfils this requirement. It also empowers students to takie responsibility, feel ownership over both the school and their lives, and learn to speak, work and organise cooperatively. This need not be a system which can necessarily be transferred to national government to be a valid way to teach people to work, nor need it imply absolute power over all aspects of the school. To accommodate all that is being asked here, the school will probably be too large to meet comfortably as one body, but the system, like much of this proposal, has been well tested and found to work (Apple & Beane, 1999; Shotton, 1993; Chamberlin, 1989), they are not reasons to opt out and elect token representatives to sit on a powerless school council.

A school with freedom, individual care, participatory democracy, learning webs and critical pedagogy would not only give each student the best possible chance to meet their individual needs, but may also prepare society to finally begin to consider its future.

Reference List

Apple, M. W., & Beane, J.A., (Eds.). (1999). Democratic schools: Lessons from the chalk face. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Chamberlin, R., (1989). Free children and democratic schools: A philosophical study of liberty and education. London: The falmer Press.

Illich, I. D., (1970). Deschooling society. London: Calder & Boyars.

Matthews, M. R., (1980). The Marxist theory of schooling: A study of epistemology and education. Sussex: Harvester Press.

Martin, R., (2001). The OECD education at a glance report 2001. Report for Australian Education Union.

McLaren, P., & Leonard, P., (1993). Paolo Friere: A critical encounter. London: Routledge.

Neill, A. S., (1926). Summerhill. Ringwood, Victoria: Penguin Books.

Shor, I., (1980). Critical teaching and everyday life. Montreal: Black Rose Books.

Shotton, J., (1993). No master high or low: Libertarian education and schooling 1890 – 1990. Bristol: Libertarian Education.

Spring, J., (1975). A primer of libertarian education. New York: Free Life Editions.

Permalink Leave a Comment

inspirations

November 15, 2007 at 4:24 pm (education, essays)

…and the final piece of newly reclaimed work from the adult ed course in turkey, is a list of good stuff, illustrating the breadth of alternative and community education in australia. it’s a bunch of things i’ve come across, and now i have it back i hope to add to it with whatever other goodies i find about the place!

Alternative and Community Adult Education

In Australia, if you look hard enough, you can find numerous examples of adult alternative and community education. These are a sample I’ve been involved in. Most of the following exist outside of formal educational structures, but even those that are associated with such structures work to enrich the communities within the organisation, and are therefore worthy of consideration as adult community education entities. Some examples are even in corporate settings, which are often excluded from Community education. I believe this is an invalid distinction; we don’t have such a surfeit of community opportunities that we can afford to cut off half the world because of its primary purposes, especially when the sections of them that attend to satisfactory second purposes, offer more scarce resources than all the ‘authentic’ community organisations put together.

Fairwear

Fairwear is the NGO that looks after outworkers in the garment industry. After nine years they’ve finally won a code of practice that makes Australian retailers responsible for the whole chain of who actually makes their products, not just the first middleman. They’ve even been granted some loopholes in the shocking new Industrial Relations laws. Anyway, apart from their legal wranglings, Fairwear organises practical support for outworkers, including seminars about their rights, and help getting their established skills and knowledge accredited as TAFE qualifications.

The Fairwear coordinator also makes presentations in schools, but only those which invite her, which are usually catholic schools, state schools sadly don’t often bother.

In “Unpaid Work in the Home and Accreditation” (Chapter 5, “Culture and Processes of Adult Learning”, Mary Thorpe, Richard Edwards and Ann Hanson (eds.)), Linda Butler examines common aspects of being a ‘housewife’ and compares them to accredited courses. When ordinary tasks like cleaning the kitchen, managing household finances or care of children are broken down into their parts and compared to the same elements in paid work, it’s shocking how much a ‘housewife’ does without even noticing.

Tatting Guild

There are a number of handcraft guilds still running. The Tatting Guild of NSW is a room full of mostly old women who meet every fortnight in a hall, and sit around and chat while they tat. (Tatting being a form of lace made with a shuttle.) Sometimes a class is held on a particular point, but more often if you want to know something, ask and someone will be able to show you. They sell tools and materials cheaply and have a membership to cover costs of hall, tea, newsletter and stands at craft shows, but anyone is welcome to turn up.

Brüel & Kjær

acoustics workshops, ostensibly to sell their product, actually help form a community and educate both new and old hands in details of the field, both about their equipment, and other various matters. though this was not what I would previously have considered community education, it was remarkable that I, as a complete novice, could sit alongside engineers and designers needing to educate themselves on a field related to their own, and veteran acoustic consultants who you’d think knew everything there was to know, and we could all gain much from the day.

Warawara

As a department of my university, Warawara our Aboriginal Education Unit is a remarkable example of Adult Education. Every university, though not every campus has a similar unit, and each one is different, but this is a run down of the one at Macquarie. Warawara runs undergraduate units in Aboriginal Studies as part of mainstream degrees, but it is also a support base, and community, for all Aboriginal students and staff. Warawara staff and volunteers tirelessly run workshops and seminars for the rest of the university community on Aboriginal issues in an attempt to make all classrooms more friendly, and make presentations to every class that invites them. They are a resource both for Aboriginal students and for everyone else. Above all of this, they run certificates and diplomas in Community Management. These are qualifications specifically for Aboriginal people who don’t have much education. Most of their students are middle-aged women in responsible positions within their remote or regional communities. These are very competent people who nonetheless have often not completed school and are understandably scared about white institutions. The courses are run on block release, so the students are flown to Sydney from their homes across the country, and put up for a week or two four times a year, in the university holidays. The rest of the year is run as a correspondence course.

Queeruption

An even more radical alternative source of education that has developed in the last 10 years around the world is Queeruption, a “free DIY gathering for queers of all genders and sexualities.” (www.queeruption.org/sydney) In February 2005, Queeruption9 was held in Sydney, and since the first organisational meetings a year previously, there has been a strong emphasis on community and on skill sharing within the queer and alternative communities of Sydney. A major part of the actual gathering was skill sharing workshops. Some workshops were arranged before the gathering starts by those who contacted the organising collective with proposals, but the majority of them were spontaneous. At the beginning of the week a large timetable was put up on site, and anyone who felt a desire to share a skill or hold a discussion, wrote a time and place and topic on the timetable. People wishing to learn a particular skill wrote messages asking those with the skill to help run a workshop. After the gathering, any locals who were involved keep the community alive by arranging other community events that are social, political and/or educational, such as reading groups and gardening days. The next Queeruption will be held in August in Tel Aviv, and connections have been made to hopefully share what we learnt in Sydney with the new organising collective.

U3A

The University of the Third Age is an organisation for people over fifty. Members pay an annual administration fee, and can then offer or take as many courses as they wish. My mother takes courses in French and Hebrew, both in small groups meeting in the teachers’ houses. The atmosphere is casual and flexible, and the groups are quite mixed in terms of backgrounds, levels, goals and purposes, but my mother doesn’t mind that they go too slowly for her, as it is a social occasion and pleasant as well as useful.

Community Colleges

In Sydney these are independent organisations that offer short courses quarterly. They are advertised in shopping centres and libraries, and operate in schools and halls. Teachers are not necessarily qualified, and there are fees. Standards obviously vary.

GASSP

A recent development in Queensland is the Gender And Sexuality in Schools Project, which held its first teacher education symposium in November 2004. This project, initiated by a group of students at the University of Queensland supported by their Student Union, seeks to educate teachers working in schools about the issues faced by GLBTIQ people in schools. By making teachers aware of queer issues, it hopes to equip them to deal effectively and sensitively with any issues that arise in their schools. The first symposium was extremely successful, attended by teachers from all over the state, and from both private and state schools. Lectures from leading Australian queer educators, a panel discussion on current government policies with members of Education Queensland, the government body responsible for all state-run education, and a session with a group of brave queer students who shared their experiences of being queer at school had a great effect on the teachers present. In the future the group hopes to be able to run short seminars in schools as part of the normal teachers’ professional development program. Unfortunately the future of the program is threatened by the recent introduction of Voluntary Student Unionism in Australia, which will make the union unable to continue to provide the same level of support, either financial or infrastructural, while the reception by the management of Education Queensland has been less than wholehearted.

PRL CLG

The Parramatta Rail Link is being built under my suburb, and one of the terms they need to fulfil in order to receive state funding is to hold Community Liaison Groups. These are small groups of interested community members and some other stakeholders, who meet every fortnight with nice folders and nametags and notes and pictures and sandwiches and cake and juice. We have toured the worksites and tunnels and learnt about blasting and tunnelling and big machinery, noise and vibration and dust traps, town planning and environmental management.

The meetings are clearly held to keep us happy and stop us making trouble for the project, but as there are some very real concerns, it is also a way for people to find out what and who we need to know, to get changes made. The project runs under very strict controls, which they demonstrably abide by, and there are staff to ensure every concern we raise is attended to, which is a good thing when a railway is boring under your house.

Volunteer Literacy Tutoring TAFE course

this course is currently scaled back and still under further threat. Not all migrants are able to come in to the TAFE (Technical And Further Education, the public technical School system) to take up their free language course, either because they’re not at an appropriate level, or for mobility or family reasons. So volunteers are trained in a free certificate. half the credit is classes about tutoring and literacy, quite practical, and for the other half you are assigned a student and you go to them for ten weeks. most of the volunteers are retired women who want to ‘give back’ or do something useful.

ARCH

The Association to Resource Community Housing sets up free seminars about all aspects of how to set up, run and live in community housing for means tested groups of people wanting to set up a cooperative. On completion of the course you get TAFE accreditation, and ARCH will recommend you to the government who will offer a new or renovated block of flats to live in for a quarter of your income.

Squatting Caretaker status

A few years ago a group of squatters won a landmark case for Caretaker status of their home and the right to live there until the owners definitively started work on the building. Part of the agreement was to be training for Caretakers, probably through TAFE. This has not happened, as the Broadway Squats were shortly evicted and noone else has yet won a similar situation, but it’s a start, and when it happens, education will be the factor that makes a revolutionary practice more publicly acceptable.

Maleny

I don’t know much about education in Maleny, but it is a town in Queensland, where last I checked, there were above thirty running cooperatives. They run a credit union, collective schools, a pub, a food collective, an artists collective… I don’t think the schools are particularly special, but they can’t be too boring in such a place.

Permalink Leave a Comment

mentoring

November 15, 2007 at 4:08 pm (education, essays)

definitions of community:

Many theorists have tried to divide communities into different kinds. Tonnies (in Galbraith) for example, distinguishes gemeinschaft communities, where people work together out of a sense of mutual goals and concerns, and gesellschaft communities, where people relate to each other only to further their own goals. Such a binary view, like Galbraith’s communities of interest and communities of function, seems overly simplistic and too inflexible to cover all the communities that could exist. Such theories set up an artificial distinction between paid work activities and other activities, which is unfortunate as it suggests that the workplace, where people spend so much of their time, effort, and hopefully interest, is somehow excluded from the possibility of community on a level deeper than instrumental, means-end relationships.

definitions of community education:

Similar concerns about simplistic inflexible categories are raised by Galbraith’s divisions of formal, non-formal and informal education. Galbraith describes formal education as having qualified teachers, credentials and being the primary function of an organisation, while nonformal education may not have some or any of these. Informal education exists outside of any sort of organisation and is the way most adult education takes place, generally within community structures. Unfortunately, many unusual and innovative forms of community education don’t fit neatly into any of these categories. Divisions are not a good way to talk about community education.

A less divisive description of community education that gives a better idea of the underlying function and motivations, is that provided by Hamilton and Cunningham. They suggest “Community-based education operates on the assumption that a given community, whether urban or rural, has the potential to solve many of its own problems by relying on its own resources and by mobilizing community action for problem resolution” (in Galbraith). This implies that instructors in the fields the community requires should be found within the community without the need for going outside to formal education providers. Such assumptions promote seeing the community itself as a resource, and not just a consuming entity.

In Deschooling Society (1973), Ivan Illich proposes “learning webs” as an alternative to formal schooling systems that could be useful – and useable – in adult education. His proposal consists of four parts: providing “reference services to educational objects” (i.e a library of tools and resources) “skill exchanges” (a database of skilled people willing to be mentors), “peer matching” (a list of other students who could be learning companions in a mutually desired skill or area) and “reference services to educators at large” (access to trained educators who can coordinate, assist and train mentors). This is an interesting and promising model with great potential, but, in its full form, is perhaps a little too radical for today’s developed world.

A similar suggestion is Galbraith’s National Mentoring Institute, which could possibly fulfil all four of Illich’s suggested components, but in a slightly more formalised way that may be a workable format for developed countries. Such an institute could both train mentors and educators, and house the coordination and resource library for a broad, far reaching web of education. This model could also encompass such initiatives as skills-based, authority-rated, optional assessment and accreditation scheme.

Mentoring is an excellent way to enrich community-based education. It straddles the boundaries between formal, nonformal and informal education, and can occur in any kind of community that makes space for it. It can also be effectively used in conjunction with other forms of education, not just replace the traditional schooling system as in Illich’s original prescription. There are many benefits of mentoring: it is a very flexible form of education provision that promotes interaction and cooperation between community members, encourages skill sharing within the community, adapts to community and individual needs and is not only an efficient use of available resources and skills, but actually generates them as well. Mentoring also acknowledges the desire, or even right, to teach as well as learn.

References:

Galbraith, M. W. (1995). “Community-Based Organisations and the Delivery of Lifelong Learning Opportunities” www.ed.gov/pubs/PLLIConf95/comm.html

Illich, I. (1973). “Deschooling Society” Harmondsworth: Penguin

Permalink Leave a Comment

definitions

November 15, 2007 at 4:02 pm (education, essays)

some definitions from week one of ED541, adult education:

There are many definitions of Adult Education in currency, however most of them share a limited number of aspects, which need definition themselves for the greater statement to have any meaning.

One could define training, learning, teaching, development, schooling, lifelong learning, continuing education, andragogy, recurrent education, nontraditional education, community education, community development, vocational education and liberal education, to compare or contrast adult education with each of them, but the bare necessities are ‘adult’ and ‘education’.

“A wide range of concepts is involved when we use the term ‘adult’. The word can refer to a stage in the live cycle of the individual; he or she is first a child, then a youth, then an adult. It can refer to status, an acceptance by society that the person concerned has completed his or her novitiate and is now incorporated fully into the community. It can refer to a social sub-set: adults as distinct from children. Or it can include a set of ideals and values: adulthood.” (Rogers (original emphasis) in Tight, p14.)

There is indeed a wide range of ways to define adults, but I don’t think any of these are relevant to who can use adult education, define it, or have it designed for them. I think we can bypass most of them by establishing internal, education-relevant criteria: an adult, in terms of a constituent of adult education, is anyone old enough to have left compulsory education. This way also, while to some extent linking with the arbitrary measure of age, allows for the age in question to vary in different societies, according to local customs. I would not however exclude anyone who considers themself adult from such a status.

Education:

“…the deliberate, systematic and sustained effort to transmit, evoke, or acquire knowledge, attitudes, values, or skills, as well as any outcomes of that effort” (Darkenwald & Merriam, p2.)

Here is a cautious, technical definition of education. It acknowledges the importance of reception, not just transmission of learning, and both content and ‘hidden curriculum’,

i) that ‘education’ implies the transmission of what is worthwhile to those who become committed to it;

ii) that ‘education’ must involve knowledge and understanding and some kind of cognitive perspective, which are not inert;

iii) that ‘education’ at least rules out some some procedures of transmission, on the grounds that they lack wittingness and voluntariness on the part of the learner.(Peters, in Tight, p16.)

This is a much more slippery definition, though with some valuable points to consider as it attempts to address finer details. It however acknowledges none of the important points of the previous quote, and is still concerned only with attributes and mechanics.

Adult Education:

Excluding school and tertiary education is a more concrete and specific assessment than merely non-formality, but Education is often defined by the purpose for which it is provided, but though education can exist without teachers, it cannot without learners. I think moreover that this is a very important point to guide our perspectives. I would be inclined to count training as a subset of education, rather than an opposition. This is particularly influenced by the possibilities, which I think very important to explore, of including broader, more cognitive aspects associated with education, in a course specifically designed to train for a narrower skill.

“Adult education is a process whereby persons whose major social roles are characteristic of adult status undertake systematic and sustained learning activities for the purpose of bringing about changes in knowledge, attitudes, values, or skills.” (Darkenwald & Merriam, p9.)

This definition, more or less a synthesis of the previous examples, gives a rough outline of the current situation. This however is not politically neutral as it is framed, in the era of economic rationalism. Looking back to earlier perspectives uncovers a mine of ideas from an entirely different perspective. These would not negate our previous definitions, but would find them appallingly limited and incomplete. I would have to agree.

The purpose of adult education “was to build democracy, to strengthen our resolve and our ability to reasonable participate in those decisions that affected our day-to-day lives.”(Lindeman, in Heaney, p565.)

It was “about problem-posing, thinking through, finding common meanings, and taking collective action.”(Heaney, p565.)

It is abundantly clear that adult education these days mostly operates without regard to these explicit ideals and goals. However there is always one or another political agenda being supported, if only implicitly. A social structure is always being maintained or resisted, a community positioned, fused or isolated, a group economically benefited or disadvantaged.

My definition:

I consider an actual definition of the term Adult Education is unnecessary. It is a complex, global phenomenon, and practitioners and theorists in different places and situations have as much right as us to define it according to their own needs and circumstances. A definition of the scope of our interest in Adult Education may be of value; I will hazard that we are interested in non-tertiary education used by people no longer in compulsory schooling, both for individual purposes including acquiring understanding, knowledge, attitudes, values or skills, and wider purposes including advancing or changing the nature of, or participation in, the social, political or economic system.

References:

Tight, M. (2002). Chapter 1 “The Core Concepts” (pp. 12 – 36) in Key Concepts in Adult Education and Training, London: Routledge (second edition).

Darkenwald, G.G. and Merriam S.B. (1982). Chapter 1: “Adult Education” (pp. 1 – 34) in Adult Education: Foundations of Practice, New York: Harper & Row Publishers.

Heaney, T.W. (2000). Chapter 36: “Adult education and society” (pp. 559 – 572) in Handbook of Adult and Continuing Education by Wilson, A.L. and E.R. Hayes (eds.), San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Permalink Leave a Comment

cultures

November 15, 2007 at 3:32 pm (education, essays)

next up…

How important are cultural differences in the classroom? Does a student’s home culture affect their educational experience? And what the ramifications of cultural differences for Adult Education?

There is much evidence that disparate cultures have significantly different teaching and learning styles. The Kamehameha Early Education Program (in Tharp, section 3) which studied a range of monocultural classrooms showed dramatically varying styles, from the calm, considered teaching style of a Navajo classroom, with an emphasis on the individual and lots of wait-time at both ends of a response, to the loud and bubbly Hawaiian class, whose teaching style is very fast paced and cooperative, and where the wait-time is negative! While these different classroom rhythms suit the students of the specific culture, a student from a different culture could have a lot of trouble coping with an incompatible, or unfamiliar classroom style. Children growing up are, naturally, learning constantly, and they learn both to communicate and learn in the dominant style of the people around them. By the time they get to school they have had years of learning in the style of their home culture, and can have problems adapting to a significantly different approach.

“Culture can be analyzed for its variable influence on individuals, taking into account the historical processes of culture of origin, but considering them as they are filtered by events and forces in individual life history, learning experiences, and current conditions” (Tharp, section 1). Culture is indeed a factor we can analyse, and, as seen in the aforementioned study, such analysis has returned startlingly informative results in certain limited circumstances. Unfortunately, the risk is always that many people want to overgeneralise such analyses. Just by knowing what culture someone belongs to does not mean you can determine how they would best be educated. It also then follows, that a teacher from the same cultural group as the students is not necessarily more effective than one from a different cultural group. It must be noted that the latter teacher is usually considered to be educated enough in cultural differences to avoid four attitudes, which are expressions of racism: bigotry, colour-blindness, paternalism and excessive compliance (Greene, in Tharp, section 2). The assumption that teachers are so culturally literate is very generous, but the question of achieving this is an entirely different area of study.

As a teacher, belonging to the same culture as one’s students does, of course, bring some advantages, but there are also some disadvantages as well. According to Tharp, the advantages are mostly restricted to creating rapport and avoiding unfortunate gaffes, rather than anything more important. This may be correct where everyone involved shares the same goals or expectations from the education, but it can be counteracted by the new perspectives an outsider may bring. Teachers are important as role models and examples for everyone. Having a teacher of one’s own culture can strengthen positive identification with that culture, but teachers of other cultures can promote cultural understanding too. Insisting on same-culture teachers means abandoning the move towards multicultural classrooms. Not only is it dangerous to assume any classroom is homogenous, even if it is not obviously multicultural, but generally matching teachers to classes risks cultural segregation, unequal opportunity for teachers and a lack of options for students, especially students who don’t fit perfectly into any designated group. Even in supposedly monocultural classrooms, there are often students who do not fit into the cultural norm.

There are three different broad opinions on how culture influences effective pedagogy. The culturally specific compatibility hypothesis suggests that each discrete culture requires a discrete approach. The two-type compatibility hypothesis sees only two groups to be treated differently from each other: all minority cultures are grouped together with one approach, different to that of the majority. The universalistic compatibility hypothesis does not consider cultural differences relevant to pedagogical decisions (Tharp, section 3). While this typology has something to say, none of the groups cover all the issues. To divide all cultures would be to box students into narrow categories that are not necessarily appropriate for them. To refuse any divisions is to ignore differences that do exist. Although two type sounds like a middle ground, and could be a good compromise, reality is more complex than that. Some minorities are more conventionally “successful” (according to the school system’s values) than others. Wu’s Chinese American school students (in Tharp, section 3), generally achieved higher test scores than even the majority-culture students. This doesn’t work in the two-type approach which supposes the school system designed for the majority culture should serve them better than any other group. However, it also supposes the current systems in America serve the majority culture well, which they don’t, for many reasons.

Discussions of cultural differences in the classroom are, like many educational issues, often only discussed in the context of children’s schooling, however, culture also needs to be considered in the field of adult education, which adds a few extra issues to the picture. The building of trust and rapport is crucial in adult education. An issue more specific to adults is that they come to education with all the problems, fears and affective barriers inherited from their times at school, and these need to be accommodated, understood and worked with. Often changing these attitudes is a major part of the education, and cultural issues can play a significant role in this.

Reference:

Tharp, R. G. (1994) “Systemic Reform: Perspectives on Personalizing Education” http://www.ed.gov/pubs/EdReformStudies/SysReforms/tharp1.html

Permalink Leave a Comment

consumption, postmodernism, adult education

November 15, 2007 at 3:20 pm (education, essays)

kat sent me the contents of her ‘kate’s assignments’ folder. turns out there are a bunch of essays from turkey that i didn’t have copies of, including some things i’d missed!

here goes with another round of essays, starting with:

Consumption, Postmodernism, Adult Education

Much of adult education is rooted in critical and liberatory philosophies. While these theories are worthy bases for progressive education, they are products of modernity, and the current period of postmodernity presents some different challenges though the two approaches share a number of aims. Like modern adult education, postmodernism undermines and raises awareness of assumptions and norms.

The postmodern world is an uncertain place, and the need for education as a way to adapt to the world is amplified. Unfortunately, postmodern theory also has profound consequences for the whole field of adult education. One of the more difficult aspects of postmodernism for an idealistic adult educator to deal with is consumption.

Consumerism, the culture of consumption for its own sake, has long been recognised as a feature of late capitalism, something that oppresses and domesticates people, makes them dependent on the system by manipulating their desires, and blinds them to their own situations. As such, adult education has sought to blunt its power by raising awareness of its mechanisms and insidious charms.

Postmodernism however, puts a different spin on it. In an unsentimental attempt to establish the way things are rather than how we would like them to be, it accepts consumption as an important feature of society, not good or evil. In fact, “consumer behaviour rather than work or productive activity has become the cognitive and moral focus of life, the integrative bond of society” (Bauman, as paraphrased in Usher, Bryant & Johnston, p16) Even though not everyone can consume equally, everyone is affected by the culture, if only in formation of desires and aspirations. What we buy or possess frames the way we categorise things and therefore the way we think and relate to people and the world. “Consumption is not so much about goods and services per se but about signs and significations” (Usher, Bryant & Johnston, p16). If consumption is indeed so embedded in society, and thus not something that can be defeated by a little more education, then it needs to be taken seriously. Ignoring changes in society means our education becomes neither relevant nor effective.

Under postmodernism, the idea of what is consumed has evolved. If purchasing things displays your status and identity, then the fact that we all end up owning too much plastic we don’t need is not the only important aspect of consumption. There is also the fact that images, lifestyle and the self can be consumed. Education can be consumed.

As postmodernism erodes the traditional bases of adult education, the field is diversifying into a much wider one of Adult Learning, which includes a wide range of areas that were previously considered frivolous, such as personal development and cultural creativity. What is on offer is often dependent on those who can afford education as a leisure activity, but the news is not all bad

Engaging with students is a vital aspect of adult education. As consumerism frames the way many people think these days it can be used to better connect to students. Education is generally more effective when presented in a context that students relate to and understand, which argues for the inclusion of consumerist ideas in the classroom.

There is certainly still some place for criticism of consumption, and consumerism, but no longer for complete rejection. How can we negotiate this? One suggestion is that teachers should avoid taking themselves too seriously, though this raises concerns about loss of the idealism that is for many people an important motivation for teaching. Another is to be flexible and acknowledge the importance of consumption and don’t automatically view it as solely a threat to community.

Reference:

Usher, R., Bryant, I. and Johnston, R. (1997). Chapter 1 “Adult Learning in Postmodernity” (pp. 1 – 27) in Adult Education and the Postmodern Challenge: Learning Beyond the Limits, Routledge: London.

Permalink 1 Comment

gender and schooling

July 4, 2007 at 6:59 pm (essays, gender)

this one is a short tut paper from gender and education, a third year ed course that i did in 2005.

“Gender and Schooling: Still making the Difference?” attempts to abridge to two pages the entire history of attention to gender in Australian schooling since 1975. Some interesting though disparate points are raised, such as noting the role that increased retention had to play in many education reforms which have implications for gender, and that cutbacks under economic rationalism have reduced the ability of state schools to provide many services which are used predominantly by boys. These however are only treated perfunctorily, by way of introduction to the meat of the argument, which is a sharp critique of the current ‘boys in education lobby’ and in particular its claims that boys are the new disadvantaged, and that they are a clear group with distinct, separate needs which must be met in the interests of equality.

The article breaks its analysis of the presented arguments into four equal points by way of numbered headings: 1. lack of attention to class and race/ethnicity, 2. the untheorised nature of the position, 3. internal contradictions, and 4. failure to recognise gender politics. Although each of these makes valid points, I would instead shuffle them to display two more methodical, comprehensive and illuminating problems with the boys’ lobby’s claims.

The first is that gender is seen as essential. This means that the binary opposition of male and female is seen not as artificial, constructed and changeable but as natural, fixed and all-encompassing. It also allows all girls to be understood as identical in certain ways, while boys must be identical to each other, and necessarily different to the girls. The differentiating effects of ethnicity and class are not taken into account, and though this article does not mention it, neither are those of differing ability, sexual preference, sexuality, experience, inclination or the perception of any of the above.

From such a problematic premise, many more conclusions are presented as perfectly natural. Of late people are anxious to deny overt sexism, but the current doctrine ‘different but equal’ isn’t far off in service to essentialism. The ‘fundamental platform of difference’ is countered with a symmetricality which, far from tempering it, obscures any opposing thought of the structural, historical and political disadvantage of girls, heavily theorised and evidenced by feminism and still being fought. This allows the playing field to be artificially set as equal, for a competition of victimhood fought on personal needs extrapolated to compulsory stereotypes, and conflated with failures which are only relative to each other. The lobby relies on this simplified view of the world to allow the subsuming of more complex feminist strategies as its own.

The second fundamental problem is with the remedies the lobby proposes. Notwithstanding the value of many of the initiatives for various students, each is an unconnected response to a symptom. In a ‘predictable hegemonic response to uphold traditional male advantage’, the underlying structures are not addressed; they promise to reveal disadvantage as a feature of almost any group but boys. And the solution to the problems of so many of those falling within the category ‘boys’? Not nearly so simple or so reassuring.

This article contains many important points on the structures and demands of contemporary arguments about the education of boys, though they are presented in haphazard connections. In doing so, it implies a way of considering the issues which may, more than just appraising the situation, help to remedy the problems which lie below the hype.

Permalink Leave a Comment

queering adult education

July 4, 2007 at 6:46 pm (education, essays, queer)

woohoo! another one!

this is from 2006, the last semester of my degree. i was in turkey, so this essay is written for people who had never heard of queer until i showed up. it was a lovely class, at postgrad level, filled with interesting and idealistic people. unfortunately we never got very much done, as we were starting from scratch, with the revolutionary idea of a non-heirarchical, student-focused class. unheard of in turkey!

Queering Adult Education

Although almost everything ‘queer’ seems to remain controversial, some aspects have achieved the status of accepted issues either in the media, academic literature or in both. There are other issues, however, which remain virtually unrecognised, particularly in educational literature, appearing only in specifically queer texts (Sears, 1999). These ideas, if discussed in the media, would no doubt be sensationalised and not given rational consideration, yet they include many ideas that would benefit the discourse, and offer new perspectives.

Adult education research and practice now routinely consider gender, ethnicity, first language, prior education level, age and class as significant factors affecting many areas of learning, but issues of sexual orientation are generally overlooked. Similarly, diversity in all these aspects is often celebrated, but diversity of sexuality and gender is more often condemned, or at best invisible (Kerka, 2001).

This essay will discuss why adopting queer inclusive attitudes and practices into adult education environments is so important, and then offers some suggestions as to how this can be done. It further addresses some of the common questions asked about these issues, and will argue that the queering of education is both necessary and achievable.

The word Queer has two main meanings. Although the two meanings can be distinct, they overlap to a great extent and which queer is meant is not always specified. The first is used as an umbrella term for LGBTIOQ, an appellation often seen in shorter variants, such as GLBT, but which grows periodically as the importance of different groupings is recognised. LGBTIOQ actually stands for Lesbian – Gay – Bisexual – Transgender – Intersex – Other – Queer, which is a common representation of the diversity of non-majority sex, gender and sexual identities. The presence of ‘Queer’ itself within the acronym denotes the more specific, postmodern meaning. This use of Queer denotes a self-identity that is fluid, not bound by traditional categories and open to change over time. Use of this ‘Queer’ is a political choice that blurs the binaries involved in the dominant views of sex, gender and sexuality (Hill, 2004), and thus is radically different from older terms such as ‘homosexual’, ‘lesbian’ and ‘gay’. These modernist terms draw on gay and lesbian studies and activism, which can be seen as having fought for pride in, and understanding of new categories rather than the questioning of such divisions. Postmodern queer however, draws on Queer Theory, an academic discipline linking the study of sexuality with wider concerns, such as the rejection and critique of categorisation and identity, and merges some aspects of its roots in lesbian and gay studies and activism with feminism, critical postmodernism and poststructuralism (Hill, 2004).

Queer theory can inform understandings of queer practice, such as ways to build communities, deal with oppression and live life in a queer way. In other words, it is “how we structure and label our lives”(Brooks & Edwards, 1999). Queer theory also draws on queer practice: “Being queer and doing queer are inherently critical stances”(Hill, 2004). Education is a very important part of queer practice. “Educating queerly” (Cahill & Theilheimer, 1999) removes the stigma of the other and teaches students to celebrate diversity. The most obvious beneficiaries of queer pedagogy are the queer students and teachers who are most visibly affected by the narrow mindedness of traditional education. Failing to pay attention to this issue can make it difficult for queer students and teachers to be comfortable in class, an affective factor that can significantly impact on students’ learning. More positively, queer education can help make up for the invisibility of queer people in much of society, which is a major problem for queer people of any age, particularly during the process of coming out to oneself, when there are a million questions, and often nowhere to turn for answers. Lack of positive role models and support in the mainstream community mean that anyone who is questioning their sexuality, or any queer person who is questioning any aspect of their life, is left without clear models of who they can be, and how, and their place in the world. As Hill states, “it is difficult to know oneself without first seeing oneself”(2004).

Encouraging all students to adapt to difference and to act and think for themselves (Pallotta-Chiarolli, 1999), however, not only benefits queer teachers and students, but is relevant to everyone. For a start it is offensive to assume no ‘straight’ students will ever question their gender or sexuality, or be called on to understand when a friend or family member does. Further, classrooms are often respected and everything that happens inside one has the potential to influence the thought and actions of others, and hence contribute to changing societal norms. Moving away from the heteronormative standards of traditional educational culture has the potential to renegotiate the borders and constructions of gender, and benefit all involved by increasing people’s flexibility and comfort level in dealing with difference.

Sexuality, which is often as much about gender and gender roles as attraction, is a topic rarely addressed in education, and discussions about, or displays of sexuality are in fact, usually suppressed as being ‘inappropriate’ subject matter in a public or formal environment. Nevertheless we are taught, implicitly and even occasionally explicitly, that the ‘correct’ sexuality is heterosexuality, and that any other would be abnormal. To ignore these issues is not only censorship, but reinforces the prevalent concept of gender as an unchanging constant and the assumption that everyone fits neatly into one of two genders, which is limiting and does not encourage or even acknowledge the diversity that exists. Teaching not just tolerance, but celebration of sexual and gender diversity, amongst other forms, will encourage rational, positive, open minded attitudes to difference, thus reducing the phobias and prejudices that are so evident in society today.

The roots of adult education lie in activism, social conscience, equality and critical theory, and it bears the responsibility to educate accordingly. Such responsibilities to society are not always recognised – Adult education sometimes categorises its theoretical frames as apolitical (Hill, 2004). However, Adult educators are in a much better position than other teachers to take up these responsibilities: although there is often still resistance, it is much less hampered by “the culture of fear and history of persecution directed at those whose sexuality or gender identifications are different from the norm. For many of us, the barriers to “queering” our classrooms are those we maintain ourselves” (Brooks & Edwards, 1999). Adult education has the freedom to cover topics many conservative parents want to ‘protect’ their children from. This is not just an opportunity but a vital responsibility.

How to implement queer education is something that even experts still have many questions about. Firstly, should queer teachers come out to their students and colleagues? This can often involve high personal risk, with possible loss of authority in the classroom, loss of employment, harassment, personal danger and in some places even legal implications. On the other hand, staying in the closet and hiding one’s sexuality and personality, involves keeping many secrets, being constantly vigilant and afraid, lying about personal matters and being unable to engage in ordinary, taken-for-granted chat and rapport building. Teachers have to decide whether being honest and not hiding half their lives is worth the risk in their particular situation, but it is more than a personal issue. A teacher who is willing to stand up and be open about their own queerness transmits a message few others can, that it’s ‘ok to be queer’, not only in theory but in reality, in public, and in the immediate context. Having an out queer role model in as immediate and respected a position as teacher can also have a demonstratedly positive impact on school students’ tolerance and critical thinking (Rofes, 1999), at the time and through the future, as well as on queer students’ comfort with their own identities and cultural literacy (Grace, 2004). Unfortunately ‘out’ teachers are rare in schools, as underscored by the many stories of people who only realise at eighteen or eighty years old that they’re not the only lesbian in the world, let alone the scores of adults who will sincerely announce that they have never met a gay person in their life. While everything related to queer remains repressed, the need and effects of role models for all ages cannot be underestimated.

On the other hand, must teachers identify as queer to teach about it? One might as well say one must belong to an ethnic minority to teach about racism, be a woman to promote gender equality, or have lived in the seventeenth century to discuss history. All teachers have a responsibility to be visibly accepting. Restricting these issues to the classrooms of queer teachers suggests it is only relevant to a minority, and furthermore puts an even heavier burden on queer teachers. While queer people are still persecuted and often avoid any mention of queer for fear of their jobs, it is sometimes straight teachers who must stand up for them.

Should a teacher raise queer issues without waiting for students to bring them up? Unfortunately students rarely bring up such issues seriously, as it is still a topic that is unacceptable or taboo, at least to a certain extent in most societies. Teachers have to be the first to broach the topic, as not to do so would be censorship by default. It’s also an area that is often thought of as part of a person’s private life, separate to other aspect of life, and the perceived connection to sex can make it an awkward topic. Such puerile attitudes can be offset by bringing up queer issues in a frank and forthright manner, without embarrassment. Some teachers object to this on the grounds that students should be able to direct their own learning, but students often can’t define their needs beforehand (Steele Foerch, 2000), especially when it comes to topics that are considered uncomfortable. And of course much of adult education, with its roots in activism and critical theory, is there to change the world; this is a good place to start.

If an open and frank attitude and approach to queer topics in class is recommended for all teachers, queer or straight, then the next question raised is ‘how?’ How should teachers approach issues that could be so sensitive and controversial in their class? One basic general suggestion is to examine your own binary ideas and the language and concepts you use in the classroom, and modify any language that assumes heteronormativity or traditional gender categories. This could mean, for example, avoiding dividing anything into two simple black and white groups, such as ‘right answers’ and ‘wrong answers’, and using gender-neutral job titles such as ‘flight attendant’ and ‘police officer’. Teachers should also make a point of using words such as ‘gay’ ‘lesbian’ ‘bisexual’ and ‘transgender’ openly, without embarrassment or unnecessary emphasis, and in any context, not just when specifically teaching about queer topics (Mattfeld & Schwartz, 2000). Strategies such as these help create a background atmosphere of critical thinking that can allow students to even entertain this new way of thinking. An extension of this is to explicitly teach students to be aware of binaries and of alternative ways of viewing the world. Teachers can help students develop the skills and attitudes to critique traditional perspectives, and avoid contributing to their reinforcement.

It is important that teachers “affirm difference by making space for students to speak from their own “different” experience” (Brooks & Edwards, 1999), but at the same time, ensure they are not pressuring students into revealing anything they don’t want to. ‘Space’ means not only allowing students to talk about their own experiences, but also allowing them not to. It also means allowing discussion of subjects about which the teacher is not knowledgeable, which is essential for topics with such personal implications: “While it is risky to admit ignorance for any teacher, knowledge claims in relation to identity can only inhibit learning” (Brooks & Edwards, 1999). Discussion of controversial and personal subjects can lead to conflict, but it is important to accept this, and allow differing opinions, without necessarily needing them to be resolved, for “if we cannot discuss conflicts around difference in the classroom, where can we discuss it?” (Brooks & Edwards, 1999)

While allowing difference of opinions is important, it is also important not to allow any homophobia to go unchallenged. Even remarks such as “it’s so gay”, often used as a general pejorative comment with no overt connection to sexuality intended, reinforces underlying ‘background’ homophobia. It can be very difficult to initiate discussion on queer issues, particularly the first time one tries, so remarks like can be viewed as a great opportunity to get the ball rolling. When challenging it is necessary to do it in a way that the student won’t find so threatening that they become oppositional and won’t engage in dialogue about it. “Don’t shut students or colleagues down for having “politically incorrect” opinions” (Mattfeld & Schwartz, 2000) but rather ask them what they mean by the comment, and whether they know what it actually means, and don’t neglect this starting point for a fuller discussion with the whole class.

A very important aspect of queering the classroom is not making any assumptions about your students’ sexualities and attitudes, or those of their family, other members of the community, people referred to, hypothetical characters in stories, or anyone at all, for that matter. It is common for everyone to be presumed heterosexual unless they visually conform to stereotypes of gay or lesbian people, but this heteronormativity should be avoided: is it not only oppressive, but inaccurate. It is commonly accepted that ten percent of people identify as gay, lesbian, bisexual or gender different, and far more have a queer friend or family member. Further than heeding a vague injunction to ‘not assume’, a teacher must be as aware of assumptions as of binaries, and both model and teach against them. Both avoiding assumptions and including queer positive themes and materials must be considered not only in the classroom, but also when developing the underlying course or program plans that guide classroom behaviour. While conservative community pressure against queer education is sadly common, to assume a community’s reaction, or that of an individual member of the community, is to cooperate with the most homophobic elements of society.

One final question that causes much panic: what if we get it wrong? Educators need some education themselves to deal with unfamiliar and sensitive issues, let alone a whole new way of seeing the world. “we need some education to do this work effectively. But if we waited until we knew everything about everything, we’d never teach. We ask our students to take risks all the time; maybe we can take more of them as well.” (Balliro, 2000). Not teaching queerly means upholding the dominant norms of the majority mainstream society, and leaves adult education “embedded in/in bed with the colonizer” (Grace & Hill, 2001).

Queering education has far reaching beneficial consequences for all members of society. Queer teachers and students can appreciate being able to be open about their lives in class, while the whole class can learn to accommodate and value difference. Society profits from the resulting gradual change in accepted norms, as intolerance of diversity in all forms becomes less supportable. Teaching queerly is something that all teachers should consider. Queer teachers currently face many risks when coming out, but doing so is beneficial to both teacher and students, as there is a lack of positive ‘out’ role models in society, and the openness and honesty creates a better learning environment. Being queer is not a prerequisite for teaching queerly: any teacher with a queer positive attitude can do so, guided by the following suggestions. Model open, accepting attitudes and initiate discussion on queer topics: don’t wait until the students do, as it is unlikely they ever will. Don’t use binaries: be aware of them and teach about them. Value and affirm difference, discuss difference and conflict openly and allow space for personal difference, even if it challenges your own authority. Allow time for people to decide whether or not to disclose personal opinions or information. Address even subtle homophobia. Don’t assume anything about your students or anyone else, be aware of what gets assumed without even being noticed, and act affirmatively against it, not just neutrally. Perhaps most importantly, don’t avoid queer topics out of fear that you will ‘get it wrong’. Avoidance is not neutral, but actively maintains the problem.

References:

Balliro, L. (2000). Are we imposing? Is it too uncomfortable? Do we know enough? Bright Ideas, 9(3). Retrieved December 17, 2005, from http://www.sabes.org/resources/brightideas/vol9/b3impose.htm

Brooks, A., & Edwards, K. (1999). For adults only: Queer theory meets the self and identity in adult education. In AERC Proceedings 1999, retrieved December 17, 2005, from http://www.edst.educ.ubc.ca/aerc/1999/99brooks.htm

Cahill, B. J., & Theilheimer, R. (1999). Stonewall in the housekeeping area: Gay and lesbian issues in the early childhood classroom. In W. J. Letts IV & J. T. Sears (Eds.), Queering Elementary Education: Advancing the Dialogue about Sexualities and Schooling. New York: Rowman & Littlefield

Grace, A. P. (2004). Using information literacy to build LGBTQ cultural literacy. In AERC Proceedings 2004, retrieved December 17, 2005, from http://www.edst.educ.ubc.ca/aerc/2004/E_G.pdf

Grace, A. P. & Hill, R. J. (2001) Using queer knowledges to build inclusionary pedagogy in adult education. In AERC Proceedings 2001, retrieved December 17, 2005, from http://www.edst.educ.ubc.ca/aerc/2001/2001grace.htm

Hill, R. J. (2004). Activism as practice: Some queer considerations. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2004(102), 85 – 94.

Mattfelt, S. & Schwartz, D. (2000). Things we can do. Bright Ideas, 9(3). Retrieved December 17, 2005, fromhttp://www.sabes.org/resources/brightideas/vol9/b3cando.htm

Kerka, S. (2001). “Adult Education and Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgendered Communities: Trends and Issues Alert, no. 21”. Retrieved December 17, 2005, from http://www.cete.org/acve/docs/tia00089.pdf

Pallotta-Chiarolli, M.(1999). My moving days: A child’s negotiation of multiple lifeworlds in relation to gender, ethnicity and sexuality. In W. J. Letts IV & J. T. Sears (eds.), Queering Elementary Education: Advancing the Dialogue about Sexualities and Schooling. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

Rofes, E. (1999). What happens when kids grow up? The long-term impact of an openly gay teacher on eight students’ lives. In W. J. Letts IV & J. T. Sears (Eds.), Queering Elementary Education: Advancing the Dialogue about Sexualities and Schooling. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

Sears, J. T. (1999). Teaching queerly: some elementary propositions. In W. J. Letts IV & J. T. Sears (Eds.), Queering Elementary Education: Advancing the Dialogue about Sexualities and Schooling. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

Steele Foerch, J. (2000). Characteristics of adult learners of mathematics. In I. Gal (ed.), Adult Numeracy Development: Theory, Research, Practice. New Jersey: Hampton.

Permalink 2 Comments

Next page »